Smart Startup: — A Fresh Take on Creative Collaboration

View Single Page

For a medium built from the ground up for collaboration, the Internet hasn’t always come through – especially for musicians and music producers. launched in 2013, with some new ideas for musical collaboration online. launched in 2013, with some new ideas for musical collaboration online.

Pretty much since computers started plugging into each other, creative Web developers have tried to crack the code that would make new musical creations flourish, and eliminate geographical boundaries in the process. But these brave pioneers have found that facilitating Jamaica-to-Jakarta jamming isn’t as easy as it looks.

Kudos are certainly owed to the ambitious platforms that have come before. Some may remember the concerted efforts of Rocket Network, which launched in 1994, and tried hard to make real-time music collaboration happen until its demise in 2003. eSession, which sought to Webify hiring and collaborating with professional musicians and engineers, never overcame its own substantial hurdles and shut down in 2012 after a five-year run.

Myriad other spins, from eJamming to Indaba and beyond, can be found today offering up their own online solutions, all with varying degrees of interest from recording artists. But when you’re talking about the infinite dimension that is the Web, there’s always the prospect of a better mousetrap, and one may have just have emerged: Enter

Connecting and Sharing

Founded by technologist/music producer Alex Kolundzija, Blend’s launchpad is the active New York City company-builder Betaworks, which also houses the likes of Digg and, Instapaper, Telecast and Giphy within its expansive offices in the Meatpacking District. A team atmosphere pervades the airy and open space – even among the markedly different companies who are at work there –the perfect place to make a new kind of creative hub.

The Blend team, Alex Kolundzija at center, is on top of developments in online collaboration.

The Blend team, Alex Kolundzija at center, is on top of developments in online collaboration.

“We want to encourage a group workflow for lot of people,” says Kolundzija, who previously worked for demanding employers such as Google and “The problem with DAW’s in general is that using them is a very lonely experience – it’s just you and your computer, you and your studio. But music is very collaborative, and that’s frequently missing. We’re hoping Blend will fill this gap, and allow distant people to make music together.”

Put simply, Blend launched in 2013 with the goal of allowing musicians and producers to share in-progress tracks, and connect with other musicians to collaborate. Registered users can browse artists and their projects, comment on their work, and remix each other’s tracks. The result is a community in perpetual beta, where dedicated music creators can seamlessly share and distribute their work – at any stage in the production.

One thing that social media mavens of all stripes have learned by now is to start small and strategically, then grow from there. On that tip, Blend is beginning with a focus on electronic music, via a platform that can currently accommodate users of Ableton Live and Native Instruments Maschine and will grow to support Reason, Garageband, Logic, Pro Tools and more as time goes on.

Social Music

Registered visitors start off with a not-unfamiliar social media experience (sign up now with the VIP code SONICBLEND to bypass the invite process and get instant access). Their personal landing page updates them on the latest music projects posted by fellow Blenders, suggests other producers to follow, invites them to publish a new project for group collaboration, and updates them on the latest status of any music projects they may already have posted – if someone has remixed their Live or Maschine arrangement, edited it, or just added a new effect, a listen to the latest take is just a click away.

The page of an active Blender

The page of an emerging Blender.

While Blend offers up many engaging ways for users to interact within the community, the real magic happens in a Blender’s ability to pull down all of the components of another user’s Live or Maschine project, open it up on their own computer, and go to work on it themselves – starting with all the effects, automation, signal chains, and sounds the last producer left off with.

Conversely, a Blender can push a Live or Maschine project from their computer onto their profile, and allow everyone else in the Blend community who hears it and likes it to go to town with creative alterations to their song, loop, or sound bite. In turn, they push it back onto the site, and the whole process begins anew. A de riguer Creative Commons license for all of the material produced keeps things squabble-free.

Under the Soundcloud-like waveform player of each file, in addition to the expected “Like”, “Follow” and “Share” buttons is a “Pull” button, along with necessary information on the source files including the size, host program and version (Maschine 8.2.1 or Ableton Live 9, for example), tags denoting style/genre/project type (“Loop”, “Groove”, “Synthpop”, “Uptempo”) and any additional notes from the publishing producer.

Rethinking the Online Approach

The Blend approach aims to improve on two key frustrations that Kolundzija frequently experienced with other online collaboration tools.

“There have been attempts to recreate the DAW in the browser – I don’t want to do that,” he explains. “Ableton is an instrument, and asking someone to switch to Firefox or Chrome is hard. It’s like asking a bass player to play violin! We want people to continue to use the tools they’re comfortable with, and arrive at a collaborative workflow that allows them to work together more effectively.

“The idea is to be able see what other people are working on, team up and also learn from each other. I can’t tell you how many projects I’ve pulled on Blend, and discovered interesting production techniques for synthesizer or master channel routing, for example. And not only do I know that this technique exists, but I have it instantly. Imagine walking into a studio and hearing how Rick Rubin sets up his channels –then imagine being able to click a button and have that instantly. It doesn’t get better than that, right?”

See how to publish a project to

Kolundzija also feels no pressure to make things work in real time. “I’m not a huge fan of that,” he says. “I feel real-time has a place when it comes to communication and getting feedback. But part of the problem with communication and collaboration today is time. In a live band, we have to rent a rehearsal space, and we all have to get in the same room at the same time.

“But if we all work on our own time, we can be much more productive. Maybe I can work on something on my lunch break, or they’ll work on something when I’m sleeping. It’s about letting people work when they want to, using whatever they’re most comfortable with.”

Real Expectations for Revenue

The crowd-sourced creativity that’s possible here is clear to see. But how can it also help an artist’s bottom line? If a band or music producer is going to start investing time in a tool, then a possible revenue stream – not just more “exposure” — is reasonable to expect in return.

Kolundzija thinks that Blend can start factoring into an artist’s earning potential over time, and in hopefully significant proportions. The “Cred Board” on Blend’s site is the first step towards that, showing which Blenders are trending high due to their number of followers and level of activity. “If someone has a million followers,” Kolundzija says, “that’s part of the formula that results in how credible they are as a Blender. How well their updates to another Blender’s projects are received by their peers in the form of Likes, Plays, etc… is another very accurate metric.

Pages: 1 2

  • DPrty

    Well first off .. Cockos Reaper should be on that list. Next .. I need to colab but will not put any of my work under creative
    commons. I wish em the best but this sounds like its going to be just
    another try.